Written by:
Vörös Imre Flórián
The search for a solution to our existence is a subject I have been voluntarily concerned with my whole life. Since my early years, I have been interested in astronomy and physics. The first thing that cursory critics of my website do is praise my lexical knowledge. This, however, is a mistaken approach. My use of quotations is focused on highlighting overlooked theoretical errors. I ask for your patience in understanding the connections between the various ideas.
The absolute relativity system is the essence of our onefold existence system. This has a volume side of existence in all states and all points in time. This is identified as the singular system of the objective material world. Our understanding has hitherto been unable to grasp the “material” state of the extensibility “beyond the material world”, rejecting even its conceptual proposal.
On the onefold filling of the ‘is’ system side of absolute relative existence, we wouldn't even notice "matter" if it weren't for the network of local collisions interacting within the system. Is this irresolvable? We have grossly neglected Newton’s First Law i.e. that a state change cannot occur by itself. What makes any volume on the system side perceptible? The scientists I contacted do not want to understand that on the system side of existence the matrix stock already interacting at the previous moment and the stock of local volumes existing in the designation state are present simultaneously. I think all this is so that the selfishly denied truth does not come out. The matrix interaction does work as interaction of absolute liquid. Due to local boundary states, it acts as a chain of liquid droplets. There is no solid object content of our existence.
The onefold filling of the system side of existence is the same as the quantum of the volume of the extension entering the system side of existence, increasing its volume with a position in accordance with the restraints of Newton's First Law! In other words, the filling of identical onefold existence volumes - regardless of their nature - cannot change their state data. Thus the phenomenon of “matter” can be experienced in the collision interaction of local volume quanta of identical filling. They behave like absolute liquids. It is important to consciously apply the conservation of matter principle and the state-change principle. As a phenomenon with data (location, volume, local vector set) it is understood as “is” on the existence system side. Comparing it to anything “tangible” (with the adoption of a reference system) is unnecessary for nature! This is merely something that our consciousness insists on due to our lack of knowledge of limited interaction.
The hundreds of billions of neurons that represent our consciousness also perceive the relative system side of existence through this interaction. What isn’t the existence system side at rest? What is the fundamental reason for this? It would be a grave mistake to neglect the source of pre-existing trigonometric differences in volume calculations of onefold local volume quanta. Irrational data discrepancies. Through our consciousness, we are capable of perceiving the image of a set of data crossing local boundary states! This is something we knew nothing about to date. Whatever is sufficient in applied mathematics is insufficient in the same absolute moment of the system side of existence. The lack of super-symmetry is already inherent. Added to this is the local interacting motion vector stock with vector direction and motion speed data as a factor modulating the structure. We experience very little of this. (Movement of the Earth in the Solar system, the Sun’s movement in the galaxy, galaxy movement in the meta-galaxy, and so on.) What of the complex finite motion vector stock associated with each point in time? The stock that is a part, content and operator of all of us. These force vectors exclude the inferior content elements of the process, which we perceive as stars, plants and atoms. This process also binds together the atoms that make up molecules. That is why the "objects" that lost out in the process structure - such as nuclei, stars, planets and globular clusters - have a spherical shape. Ultimately, this is the source of the disc-like shape of galaxies.
Please, take time to understand these minute details. It takes a great deal of time and stress tolerance to find the solution we are looking for. Our existence is the effect, the end result, for which I had to find the right questions.
It became clear that there are no so-called physical constants in the existence process system. The main proof of this lies in the constant thermodynamic constraint. If anything, it is the only constant in the system. Naturally, this doesn’t exclude the possibility of scientists and technologists using empirical constants for resolving tasks of an applied nature.
The applied misuse of some of our theoretical knowledge has become apparent, which are small in scale, yet have a fatally large impact on limiting understanding. These typically include, for example, Einstein's light speed limit, which is typically extended to all forms of movement. The scope of Einstein's system of relativity is the (in theory, non-existent) behaviour comparison system of the set of secondary objects created by our consciousness. The chain of local collisions (interactions) is broken in situations of local extension. The imaging ability of our mind simply bypasses this. And thus it falsifies reality.
The source of all-encompassing evolution is the modulation caused by cluster data expanding with extension local volumes. The volume and structure of the set's complex motion system, and consequently the local motion value data increase continuously and without limit. This has nothing to do with Einstein. Einstein's speed of light is merely the propagation velocity of local modulation in the visible set. We know that electromagnetic waves travel at different speeds in different materials. The aether, or outer space, is just another medium, the hidden properties of which have not been previously identified. Yet that’s not all. Not indeed.
All “permanent cosmos” theories must be interpreted by taking this into account. The requirement of understanding: it takes place at all places and times at the same point in time. The key to understanding: at my point of observation, I am within the totality of the nearby and unknown complex system of movement. Therefore I encompass the entire stock of real motion vectors, vector direction and value data changes at all times, in the same point in time. That is the point. This is the content evolution of our existence.
1./ Relativity must be derived, interpreted and applied from the set of completeness at all points in time.
2./ According to the priority stated in item no. 1, the importance of the experienced movement realizes the internal value data of the set with local absolute finite values. In this way, the designation of local positions on the outer boundary of the set is also realized. The system has no consciousness. This fact raises the importance of the true paradox presented in my thesis to a priori level.
3./ The outer boundary of our set of existence consisting of a onefold finite number of members can be extended to include additional set entities (in the situations of the internal local finite boundaries of the absolute system).
4./ At the given time (in the state of change), the mathematically adequate value of the system side of existence = 1. Similarly, the reality value of any entity in the system = 1. This is the value of extension entities that enter the system even by local designation, which are actualized for perception, the ignorant system, during local interaction. After all - according to Newton's First Law - no state data can be overwritten without interaction.
5./ The differences in the volume size of local extension entities - beyond the fundamentally different movement vector section value data - would be unable to maintain a complex structure-less set (existence) system due to trigonometric objective differences (irrational data values). Applied mathematics has no say in this!
The true paradox
Any local boundary and extension position of the cosmos existing in a state of absolute motion and onefold filling can be (is) at the centre of the cosmos - even all of them at the same time. This is due to the fact that absolute external boundary conditions are (can be) in the same place. The error margin is "merely" +/-1 local extension volume (neutrino) in all directions. The system does not aggregate local absolute data in the form of a secondary set image! This only comes together in our consciousness in the image-forming interaction of hundreds of billions of our autonomous cells. For this reason, our consciousness can summarize this as the "Universe", arbitrarily seeing it as "object" entities. Local extension boundary conditions are also the external short boundary sections of the complete set from all directions and at all points in time! The key to the solution is correctly considering the relativity system derived from the prevailing finite totality of the movement system! This replaces the apparent solution of the verified constructive theory of Einstein's set of local relative changes (which are otherwise objective by the summarizing consciousness). (See, what did Einstein write about constructive theory?) The bottom line is that there is a difference in principle, concept and content between the content of cause-and-effect relativity systems. Newton's universal law of changes of state also applies to any onefold filling of the system side of existence. This includes both what is already included in it and what is added to the system side of existence by designation of position (extension as a local volume). We can also state, in accordance with our current approach to quantum physics, that the set of the S-matrix of existence is a single quantum quantity at all points in time (change in state). This is because it is a single absolute correlative interaction (bootstrap) system. This systematic process is the continuously changing medium of particle physics. Modulating the content process to be observed with any detection equipment (before or during the process) would be tantamount to falsifying the content. Therefore all "results" of the CERN equipment use are falsifications of reality.
What hinders the understanding of the contents of my thesis and website is that we were not consciously aware of the conceptual system I used. There are some who feel that I am over-explaining our relative system of existence. Yet if I fail to do so, they will say that matter is not created from nothing. Matter is a phenomenon of interaction, which allows us to perceive it. Nature intends to resolve its own reference system, yet due to local data asymmetries, it fails to do so. That is why it repeats its own local processes in order to achieve its final state of rest. Fortunately, it has no consciousness that would allow it to end this Sisyphean task. Newton's restraint of changes of state remains a binding law even for motion vectors and when faced with the problem of trigonometry.
However, our physicists do not intend to fully understand. Admitting their mistakes would result in a loss of authority. There is tacit agreement between them on this subject. There is nothing particularly wrong with using applied physics, but it is burdened with theoretical errors. For example, the biggest fallacy is the limit of the speed of light extended to all physical phenomena, the reference system of our existence is "is", system, side, "set" in the data content. I have to say this because of our fixed picture of the set, in which we persistently cling to an external boundary of a set of effects absorbed only by consciousness. However, they are in the local positions of the absolute system. So E=mc2 is a mistake of principle. For applied science, the use of the formula E=1/2mv2 is perfectly appropriate.